bens prostate power reviews

The website for Ben’s Prostate Power is very professional and detailed. It contains background information about the company and talks about their manufacturing process and safety standards. The site is easy to navigate and contains additional features that includes a test for men to determine how severe their symptoms are. Ben’s Prostate Power can be purchased through the website and the ordering process is simple and secure. Customers can order one bottle at a cost of $59.95 or take advantage of the discounts offered on larger orders. All purchases are shipped in plain packaging to protect privacy and covered by a 90 day money back guarantee.

Ben’s Prostate Power Reviews – Does It Really Work?

As the owner/sponsor of this e-commerce website, we have the full intention to be compliant with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rules about the use of testimonials, endorsements, and overall content in advertising and marketing. Accordingly, we want you as a visitor to understand the instances we get paid to sell all products or services on this site.

Content

The content that appears on this page is presented as a nominative use product overview. The provided information includes product information, overviews, buying guides, and product specifications. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service-marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners. If any content is factually inaccurate please contact us and let us know so that we can address it appropriately. By contributing your product facts helps to better serve our readers and the accuracy of the content.

Our Top Selections Box – Promotional Sales

The table below identified “Our Top Products” does not include all companies or all available products in the market but those that we promote as the owner of and/or resellers of all products listed within it. In full compliance with the FTC guidelines, please assume that any and all links on the table are sales links, and we receive compensation if you click one of these and make a purchase through our website. We are independently owned and the opinions expressed here are our own. All editorial content is written without prejudice or bias, regardless of product sponsor associations.

For best results take 1 capsule with each meal, three times a day.

Introducing Prostate Power

Quality Ingredients

Prostate Power is a high purity, high strength formulation, containing a unique blend of boron, rye flower pollen and saw palmetto that work to provide urinary relief.

Ethical

We source our products in an environmental and sustainable way. We maintain visibility of every stage of our supply chain, and ensure a living wage for everyone involved.

Unrivalled Purity

Prostate Power contains the only Saw Palmetto extract that qualifies as a United States Pharmacopeia Verified Dietary Ingredient.

Bioavailable

Each and every ingredient is expertly sourced/ selected for the highest absorption, providing you with an effective product for a great price.

Ben’s Prostate Power reviews are a mix between positive and negative. Some testimonials claim that the product may cause possible side effects like stomach swelling, nausea, and heartburn. It is only sold on the manufacturer’s official website.

How Does Ben’s Prostate Power Work?

Ben’s Prostate Power is made using a synergistic formulation of scientifically tested compounds that have proven benefits and may be able to reduce symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia or BPH. It is an all-natural product that is compiled in a pill. Once the pill is swallowed and dissolved in your stomach, the nutrients get absorbed by the intestines and offer relief from BPH as well as improving the urinary symptoms and lower the possibility of developing cancer.

Carson stopped short of making substantive medical claims about Mannatech’s products. “You know, I can’t say that that’s the reason I feel so healthy,” he said. “But I can say it made me feel different and that’s why I continue to use it more than ten years later.” His apparent hesitation is understandable. Seven years before Carson appeared in that video, then-Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican who was elected governor of Texas last year, sued Mannatech for running a illegal marketing scheme under the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Abbott claimed that the Dallas-based company and its sales representatives repeatedly exaggerated the medical efficacy of their products.

Ben Carson’s Mannatech Problem

The GOP candidate denied any relationship with the controversial health-supplement company. His record says otherwise.

During Wednesday’s GOP presidential debate in Boulder, Colorado, CNBC moderator Carl Quintanilla asked Ben Carson, a leading GOP contender and an accomplished pediatric neurosurgeon, about his relationship with a controversial nutritional-supplement company.

“There’s a company called Mannatech, a maker of nutritional supplements, with which you had a ten-year relationship,” Quintanilla asked. “They offered claims that they could cure autism and cancer. They paid $7 million to settle a deceptive-marketing lawsuit in Texas and yet your involvement continued. Why?”

“Well, it’s easy to answer,” Carson quickly replied. “I didn’t have an involvement with them. That is total propaganda and this is what happens in our society. Total propaganda.” He then backtracked a little. “I did a couple of speeches for them. I did speeches for other people, they were paid speeches,” he told the crowd before switching back to a full denial. “It is absolutely absurd to say that I had any kind of relationship with them.” Then he again acknowledged a role. “Do I take the product? Yes, I think it’s a good product.”

Presidential candidates frequently stretch the truth. Some of them have made fantastical claims about President Obama’s birth certificate, for example, or their ability to construct a giant wall on the Mexican border that Mexico will pay for. But Carson’s outright denial seems egregious even by that standard. His relationship with the company is lengthy and well-documented, which makes his response even more bizarre.

Carson first spoke out in favor of Mannatech products over a decade ago when he claimed that the Texas-based company’s “glyconutritional supplements,” which included larch-tree bark and aloe vera extract, helped him overcome prostate cancer.

The company doctor “prescribed a regimen” of supplements, Mr. Carson told its sales associates in a 2004 speech. “Within about three weeks my symptoms went away, and I was really quite amazed,” he said to loud applause, according to a YouTube video of the event.

The candidate today is cancer-free after surgery. He told associates of the company, Mannatech Inc., that he initially considered forgoing surgery and treating the cancer with supplements only.

As the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month, Carson’s relationship with the company deepened over time, including “four paid speeches at Mannatech gatherings, most recently one in 2013 for which he was paid $42,000, according to the company.” The company disputes that Carson was a “paid endorser or spokesperson,” according to the Journal, and claims his financial compensation went to charity.

National Review also highlighted Carson’s connections to Mannatech in January and how Carson’s team went to great lengths to distance themselves from the company. Some of his video appearances have been removed from the Internet, but those that remain appear to show a deeper affiliation than Carson claimed during Wednesday’s debate.

In one video for Mannatech last year that remains online, Carson discusses his experiences with nutritional supplements while seated next to the company’s logo. “The wonderful thing about a company like Mannatech is that they recognize that when God made us, He gave us the right fuel,” Carson explained. “And that fuel was the right kind of healthy food … Basically what the company is doing is trying to find a way to restore natural diet as a medicine or as a mechanism for maintaining health.”

Carson stopped short of making substantive medical claims about Mannatech’s products. “You know, I can’t say that that’s the reason I feel so healthy,” he said. “But I can say it made me feel different and that’s why I continue to use it more than ten years later.” His apparent hesitation is understandable. Seven years before Carson appeared in that video, then-Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican who was elected governor of Texas last year, sued Mannatech for running a illegal marketing scheme under the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Abbott claimed that the Dallas-based company and its sales representatives repeatedly exaggerated the medical efficacy of their products.

“Texans will not tolerate illegal marketing schemes that prey upon the sick and unsuspecting,” Abbott’s office said at the time. “Aided by an army of multi-level sellers and their fictitious claims about its products, Mannatech has aggressively marketed supplements to countless unwitting purchasers.” Abbott also emphasized that the company’s claims were “not supported by legitimate scientific studies, nor are its products approved as drugs by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.”

Mannatech paid a $6 million settlement in 2009 in which the company admitted no wrongdoing. “Under the agreed final judgment, Mannatech agreed not to advertise or otherwise claim that its dietary supplements can cure, treat, mitigate, or prevent disease,” according to Abbott’s office. The settlement also levied a $1 million fine against company founder Samuel Caster and banned him from working for Mannatech for five years.

Carson is neither the first nor the only high-profile doctor to endorse nutritional supplements with dubious scientific backing. A Senate subcommittee excoriated Dr. Mehmet Oz last year for promoting “miracle” pills and “magic” weight-loss solutions on his nationally televised daytime talk show. My colleague James Hamblin noted that Oz’s endorsements helped fuel a “sordid, under-regulated” market for self-proclaimed miracle cures. The industry is largely shielded from regulatory scrutiny by the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, which does not require dietary and nutritional supplements to be approved by the FDA before their sale in the United States.

The debate question could have provided Carson with an opportunity to clarify his relationship with the company and his views on nutritional supplements. Instead, his denial will only increase public scrutiny of his interactions with a controversial industry.

Over the last 20–30 years the incidence of prostate cancer has quadrupled, largely because of the introduction of widespread prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) testing, although the incidence in the UK may now have reached a plateau (UK Prostate Cancer Statistics, 2008 [7]). In the USA, the incidence peaked in 1992, and death rates have been decreasing since 1998 [8]. In the UK there has been a significant decline in the age-standardised mortality rate between 1993 and 2005, but the overall mortality rates have remained largely unchanged, as the decreasing mortality rate is counteracted by the aging population.

Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) was first developed in the 1970s. TRUS-guided biopsy, under local anaesthetic and prophylactic antibiotics, is now the most widely accepted method to diagnose prostate cancer. However, the sensitivity and specificity of greyscale TRUS in the detection of prostate cancer is low. Prostate cancer most commonly appears as a hypoechoic focal lesion in the peripheral zone on TRUS but the appearances are variable with considerable overlap with benign lesions. Because of the low accuracy of greyscale TRUS, TRUS-guided biopsies have become established in the acquisition of systematic biopsies from standard locations. The number of systematic biopsies has increased over the years, with 10–12 cores currently accepted as the minimum standard. This article describes the technique of TRUS and biopsy and its complications. Novel modalities including contrast-enhanced modes and elastography as well as fusion techniques for increasing the sensitivity of TRUS-guided prostate-targeted biopsies are discussed along with their role in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Over 35 000 new cases of prostate cancer are diagnosed per annum in the UK and there are over 10 000 deaths annually [1-4]. It is the most common cancer in males in the UK, and causes 13% of all cancer deaths in males. The lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer is one in nine. It has been estimated from post-mortem data that approximately half of all males in their fifties have prostate cancer, which increases to 80% by the age of 80 years, but only 1 in 26 men will die from their disease—supporting the fact that males are more likely to die with prostate cancer than from it [5,6].

Over the last 20–30 years the incidence of prostate cancer has quadrupled, largely because of the introduction of widespread prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) testing, although the incidence in the UK may now have reached a plateau (UK Prostate Cancer Statistics, 2008 [7]). In the USA, the incidence peaked in 1992, and death rates have been decreasing since 1998 [8]. In the UK there has been a significant decline in the age-standardised mortality rate between 1993 and 2005, but the overall mortality rates have remained largely unchanged, as the decreasing mortality rate is counteracted by the aging population.

Risk factors for prostate cancer include age, a positive family history, abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), raised PSA level and ethnicity. Black African and Caribbean men have two to three times the risk of being diagnosed with and dying of prostate cancer than white men, whereas Asian men have the lowest risk.

Prostate cancer can be divided into low-, intermediate- and high-risk disease, depending on the aggressiveness of the tumour. Since the 1970s there has been a marked change in the presentation of prostate cancer. Before PSA testing and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) became widely available, most patients presented with cancer-specific symptoms owing to locally advanced disease and the cancers were diagnosed by DRE, so that the majority were diagnosed at stage T2 ( Table 1 ) or more. Nowadays, most cases (>90%) are diagnosed at an asymptomatic early stage (stage T1) because the advent of widespread PSA testing and TRUS-guided biopsy has enabled early diagnosis, with nearly half of all newly diagnosed patients falling into the “favourable risk” group. Over the past 20 years the proportion of males with low- vs high-risk disease at diagnosis has shifted significantly from 29.5% vs 36.6% (1989–1992) to 46.8% vs 16.0% (2000–2002) [9]. Liberal screening with PSA testing ( Table 2 ), however, does have its disadvantages, with a significant false-positive rate (only 30% of males with an elevated PSA level will have cancer) and a recognised false-negative rate (15% of men with PSA<4 ng ml −1 will have a cancer focus). It is also unable to distinguish between aggressive and indolent cancers.

You know, before I had prostate cancer I didn’t even know I had a prostate gland. So I went from a base of not even knowing that this gland existed to finding out I had cancer in it. At first, I was fearful. I couldn’t sleep at night. I was worried about the future.

Disclaimer:

As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.

Comments

I was diagnosed with prostate cancer after a biopsy in February 2011 at the age of 68.I had a PSA of 4.1 at the time and a Gleason Score of 3+3=6.I was told that I had an option of radiation or surgery. I found that I had another option which was Active Surveillance.My urologist did not tell me this. I found out while researching the disease. I thought that this was the way for me. I began to fight the cancer by de-toxing and taking Essiac and Maitake mushroom fraction D on a regular basis. I stopped drinking alcohol and began to eat foods that fight cancer. I do not eat fast foods, white rice,white sugar, and white rice. I added pomegranate juice and various nuts to my diet.I read that walking three hours a week helps to stop the growth of prostate cancer.I also eliminated process foods, beef, pork and sweets. I eat a lot of vegetables,especially tomatoes, fruits, salmon,green and ginger tea, and chicken.I drink water with lemon at times. I use Stevia as a sweetener. I pray using verses in healing from the Bible. I also meditate.While I am meditating I imagine seeing the word “healing” emanating from my prostate gland. I had another biopsy in 2012 and cancer was found in another area that was not detected in the previous biopsy;however,cancer was not found in the area previously diagnosed. My PSA’s were and are up and down. There were 12 cores taken each time that I had a biopsy and only one core had 5% cancer in each of the first two biopsies. In 2012 and 2013 cancer was not detected in any of the cores from the biopsies. I have declined to do anymore biopsies even though my urologist think that I should. I feel good and my last PSA recently was 3.8. The one before was 3.2.I get PSA’s every six months. I also get DRE’s periodically.I am now 75 years old and still active sexually.I drink red wine now and cheat on my diet occasionally. Most people eat three meals a day which comes up to 1,095 meals a year. Cheating every now and then has proved not to be detrimental.Dr. William Li’s anti-angiogenesis diet is healthful also.I have used the Kegel exercise due to frequent urination at times.

Interesting article and common to so many men. My personal experience is quite similar. Following the discovery of a PSA 6.44 in 2013, I was pressured into a biopsy etc… I was diagnosed with a prostate cancer Gleason 4+4. This did quite much change my life. I decided not to follow classic medicine of surgery, radio and chemio as suggested. I also extensively studied all alternatives and decided to stay clear from the hospitals. Now in 2018, 5 years later, my PSA rose to 19,8 and cancer size has increased from 11 to 12,5 mm. I think cancer is a blessing and although I know I am very lucky, I am confident that I can manage my disease for a certain more number of years. I changed my lifestyle and diet and opted for a stress free life. I am now 55

Dick
an appendix to my story yesterday
I have increased my physical exercise viz. walking
I walk one day in a walking group in the mountains of the Pyrenees and the rest of the week I try to maintain walking on the boulevards – roughly between 70 and 100 km per week.
other sports have negative side effects, like running, most people are a bit weighty and ruin there knees,
cycling I call a lazy sport.
the other item I will deepen: the visit to dr. Bihl in Stuttgart: he invites about 4 to 5 patients – they all have to be there at noon, as soon as the last person arrives he orders a lab to make a nuclear based medicine which has a maximum life-time of 6 hours – whilst waiting for the arrival of the medicine he asks the patients to drink water with a reactionary substance what will make the 7meters long intestines go white on the computer screens and underneath more darker so to observe and notice more clearly the reaction in colour of the nuclear based medicine what will be inserted in a vein of an arm just before entering the MRI-scan – dr. Bihl has two assistants, also physicians,
they all look at what appears on the screen and the patients who are send there by local physicians who are dealing with critical patients and self searching ones like me.
Of course local physicians DO NOT like sending patients to this specialist because it can show them up in a negative light….
The PSA has a soft maximum of 4 and a hard maximum of 10
when that is reached something should be done.
The result I got was that I had a tiny inflammation in the lobes of the prostate, which goes away by itself.
The HIFU-system(I think it means High Intensity Frequency Unit) is to burn the bad molecules in the prostate and leave the good ones untouched and one is cured and enjoy sex again. The prostate with older men are mostly bigger and have to be shrunk by a chemical medicine(sometimes with side effects) or in the HIFU treatment it is peeled first (like a potatoe) to fit the machine.

Dick
I read the patient’s story (i.e.Ben Hunter) with great interest because I studied for abt. 20 years from age 50 to 70 a few nights a week in internet and learned a few things from specialists(few) who were honest…
my PSA slowly went upwards in a yo-yo style than 5.6 changing into 7.3 than 6.2 so when it goes up and down it is not prostate-cancer it is benign hyperplasia – my prostate is 5 times bigger than normal-normal is 30grams,mine is 160grams I am waiting for a MRI-scan(resonancia magnética).
What I have learned by meeting a technician who actually
had prostate cancer,where the specialist insisted on “biopsy” 6 takes which caused bleeding and they did not find any cancer, than 10 times “biopsy”(having heavy bleeding for a solid 2 weeks, almost causing a trauma) than a few had cancer results but this rich man phoned anywhere in the world for a secure-treatment of killing the cancer cells but not the good ones so that he could be cancer free and still uses his prostate. He found only one place in the world viz.
a prostate clinic in Heidelberg, Germany who uses the HIFU-system a bit different than other clinics and with better results.After a year his PSA went from 0 to 1.0 than he had to call- they advised him to go to Stuttgart dr. Bihl and have a MRI-scan -they saw cancer-cells roaming around the prostate – he than phoned LE(=Life Extension)in USA who are a group of young physicians who make their own supplements
after discussion amongst the group they advised him which
supplements to take – which strength – and when to take it and how many times a day.
with this knowledge, when my PSA climbed in a wave-pattern passed 10.0 the specialist wanted a “biopsy” which I refused. In jan.2018 it was 12 – in april it peaked at 17 –
than I started really to change my eating habits –
and in 3 weeks it went down to 11.3 also I noted that my CRP went down as well from 0.55 to 0.11,
because eating tomatoes and fish flushed down by pomegranate
(100%)juice eating more vegetables(broccoli) and fruit(mixing several red fruits)as well bananas plus walnuts&pistache.
A note: I use fish viz tuna fish in olive oil in glass pots
(not in cans)
Doctors should NEVER prescribe: taking “biopsy” from the prostate. WHY: they make a hole in that tiny organ –
if there is cancer it can escape – but what is more critical or dangerous is the fact that the needle can destroy the function of the valve in the middle of that tiny organ which will make the patient incontinent – several doctors advice
to take the whole organ away than it happened a lot that the “biopsy” of the removed prostate appeared to be benign and not cancerous. But than the damage is done and the patient can hardly drink anything anymore and has to try the wake up dormant muscles(only possible with very strong willed men but taking abt 3 to 6 months) around his urine tract in order to drink something.I am taking now when I go to sleep a tablet(SILODYX 8mg)in order to shrink my oversized prostate.
Extra note: I am 78years of age
I am the first born from 5, no.2 2 years younger never had anything checked by regular blood results and eating mostly
in the States(assigned work)reached 65 years of age and after 3 month they found prostate cancer and within 3 month he perished.
I take abt. 10 different supplements all anti-oxidant, rising immune levels also saw palmetto,Lycopene,vit.E,Selenium,Q10,B-complex,B12,Silicium
Eating: no more potatoes, no more fried, no meat, no cola or juices, no alcohol, no more eggs, no sausages, no milk products, only from plants, no butter, no mayonnaise, etc
So a great website, but missing a few items.
Dutchman, living in Spain, still learning+reading

the best article ever thanks my doctor discover a very high PSA but at 77 years old I am not worried my PSA the last 10 years has been having a yo-yo up and down but now reading that article will change my diet or already very good but without tomatoes will try that one.
thanks again