Many patients move towards natural supplements because of prolonged illness instead of using medication. Researches have now enabled us to make supplements for every age group including kids and senior citizen. Ben’s Natural Health is a research and manufacturing concern of natural dietary supplements. Ben Ong, a United States resident, is the founder of Ben’s Natural Health. We have the customer reviews of health seekers on our website who have experience of using Ben’s Natural Health supplements. They can be of possible interest to others who intend to use natural supplements.
Ben’s Natural Health
In 2006, every 1 out of 5 adults was looking for natural or herbal supplements in the United States of America. People use supplements for various reasons like improvement of health, fulfilling deficiencies, treatment of disease, muscular strength, weight loss and weakness after recovery from disease. The natural supplements are made from plants, herbs, shrubs and fruit extracts. These natural extracts contain vitamins and amino acids. Most supplements can be used in any form like tablets, capsules or syrups. Nowadays, many nutritional companies are offering food supplements for different problems faced by patients.
Many patients move towards natural supplements because of prolonged illness instead of using medication. Researches have now enabled us to make supplements for every age group including kids and senior citizen. Ben’s Natural Health is a research and manufacturing concern of natural dietary supplements. Ben Ong, a United States resident, is the founder of Ben’s Natural Health. We have the customer reviews of health seekers on our website who have experience of using Ben’s Natural Health supplements. They can be of possible interest to others who intend to use natural supplements.
About the Ben’s Natural Health
The company was founded in the year 2000 by Ben Ong. Ben Ong was inspired by natural supplements when he got an illness. He was prescribed a lot of medicines. However, after learning side effects, Ben decided to find a solution by his research. Ben continued learning about natural supplements for years. During discovering the cure of his illness, he made a team of physicians, nutritionist and few other medical professionals to make supplements for every possible deficiency, illness, physical and cognitive need. The 1st supplement they made, was for prostate disease and now they have multiple supplements of different efficacies.
Products and services provided by Ben’s Natural Health
Are you a nutritionist or someone looking for nutritional support? Ben’s Natural Health supplements are available on their online shop, www.bensnaturalhealth.com. Their supplements are divided into five different categories. These are prostate, diabetes, sexual health, general health and anti-ageing. In prostate and sexual health, they have Vegicaps, B Complex, tincture, power enhancer, healers, estrogen clearing and a total prostate health program. The diabetes category includes a reading book and a Glyco-optimizer.
The general category supplements are Antarctic Krill, Deep Sleep and Beta Glucan. They are supplying natural supplements across borders. With all other services, they also offer affiliate programs for possible rebates and discounts. Apart from supplements, Ben’s Natural Health gives consultancy to patients that reach them via their website “support tab” or telephone number. They have a team of doctors, authors and medical practitioners with specialities in prostate, diabetes, physical fitness and chiropractics.
What You Should Eat on the Ketogenic Diet
When used as directed, Ben’s Prostate Healer is likely to have several benefits for the prostate gland, ensuring it remains a healthy size to alleviate many of the symptoms associated with BPH. Being able to see the full list of ingredients used in the formula means that consumers can have a clear understanding of how it works and knowing the exact amounts used gives an indication of the overall strength of the product. Ben’s Prostate Healer is made by a reputable manufacturer and, unlike some products of this type, has been clinically tested, not only for effectiveness but in terms of quality and consistency.
Ben’s Prostate Healer – The Overview
Ben’s Prostate Healer is a natural supplement that supports the long-term health of the prostate gland. According to the official website for the supplement, approximately 60-70% of men over the age of 50 suffer from issues with their prostate, the most common problem being enlargement of the gland, a condition known as Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. When this happens, the gland puts pressure on the urethra, resulting in frequent urination, an inability to fully empty the bladder, ‘dribbling’ between bathroom visits and many other distressing symptoms. Many men also find that it also has a negative effect on their sexual function, further reducing their quality of life. The manufacturer of Ben’s Prostate Healer states that their supplement has a positive effect on the prostate gland, with full results seen for most users.
The website for Ben’s Prostate Healer is very professional and detailed. It contains background information about the company and talks about their manufacturing process and safety standards. The site is easy to navigate and contains additional features that includes a test for men to determine how severe their symptoms are. Ben’s Prostate Healer can be purchased through the website and the ordering process is simple and secure. Customers can order one bottle at a cost of $69.95 or take advantage of the discounts offered on larger orders. All purchases are shipped in plain packaging to protect privacy and covered by a 90 day money back guarantee.
It is suggested that the user take 7.5 milliliters of Ben’s Prostate Healer each day with an evening meal.
How Does Ben’s Prostate Healer Work?
This is where things get interesting. Of course, Ben’s Prostate Healer is said to work much like many other prostate health supplements: by protecting your prostate from oxidation damage and free radical damage. However, the makers of Ben’s Prostate Healer also claim that their product will also improve immune response.
Secondly, Ben’s Prostate Healer may be helpful because the ingredients are cold pressed. Therefore, more of the nutrients from them are stored. It is also claimed that Ben’s Prostate Healer will help fight off bacterial infections. Of course, if Ben’s Prostate Healer may improve prostate health, it stands to reason that it will also help men who find themselves taking frequent nighttime trips to the bathroom.
KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN KEEP CONTAINER TIGHTLY CLOSED, STORE IN A COOL, DRY PLACE.
Supplement Facts
Suggested Usage
For best results, take one dosage of 7.5ml per day (second line of cap) with your evening meal. If you feel you require a larger dosage, you may take an additional dose of 3.75ml before going to bed..
KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN KEEP CONTAINER TIGHTLY CLOSED, STORE IN A COOL, DRY PLACE.
CONTAINS NO PRESERVATIVES
This formula has been developed by Ben Ong to support various health objectives when used in conjunction with his recommended diet and exercise program as described in his books
Daily Dose: 7.5ml per day
After spending two years in California, where he was working on a film, Ben returned to his home on the East Coast in 1996. He contacted his doctor to schedule a routine physical exam. But his routine was about to be disrupted.
Disclaimer:
As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.
Comments
I was diagnosed with prostate cancer after a biopsy in February 2011 at the age of 68.I had a PSA of 4.1 at the time and a Gleason Score of 3+3=6.I was told that I had an option of radiation or surgery. I found that I had another option which was Active Surveillance.My urologist did not tell me this. I found out while researching the disease. I thought that this was the way for me. I began to fight the cancer by de-toxing and taking Essiac and Maitake mushroom fraction D on a regular basis. I stopped drinking alcohol and began to eat foods that fight cancer. I do not eat fast foods, white rice,white sugar, and white rice. I added pomegranate juice and various nuts to my diet.I read that walking three hours a week helps to stop the growth of prostate cancer.I also eliminated process foods, beef, pork and sweets. I eat a lot of vegetables,especially tomatoes, fruits, salmon,green and ginger tea, and chicken.I drink water with lemon at times. I use Stevia as a sweetener. I pray using verses in healing from the Bible. I also meditate.While I am meditating I imagine seeing the word “healing” emanating from my prostate gland. I had another biopsy in 2012 and cancer was found in another area that was not detected in the previous biopsy;however,cancer was not found in the area previously diagnosed. My PSA’s were and are up and down. There were 12 cores taken each time that I had a biopsy and only one core had 5% cancer in each of the first two biopsies. In 2012 and 2013 cancer was not detected in any of the cores from the biopsies. I have declined to do anymore biopsies even though my urologist think that I should. I feel good and my last PSA recently was 3.8. The one before was 3.2.I get PSA’s every six months. I also get DRE’s periodically.I am now 75 years old and still active sexually.I drink red wine now and cheat on my diet occasionally. Most people eat three meals a day which comes up to 1,095 meals a year. Cheating every now and then has proved not to be detrimental.Dr. William Li’s anti-angiogenesis diet is healthful also.I have used the Kegel exercise due to frequent urination at times.
Interesting article and common to so many men. My personal experience is quite similar. Following the discovery of a PSA 6.44 in 2013, I was pressured into a biopsy etc… I was diagnosed with a prostate cancer Gleason 4+4. This did quite much change my life. I decided not to follow classic medicine of surgery, radio and chemio as suggested. I also extensively studied all alternatives and decided to stay clear from the hospitals. Now in 2018, 5 years later, my PSA rose to 19,8 and cancer size has increased from 11 to 12,5 mm. I think cancer is a blessing and although I know I am very lucky, I am confident that I can manage my disease for a certain more number of years. I changed my lifestyle and diet and opted for a stress free life. I am now 55
Dick
an appendix to my story yesterday
I have increased my physical exercise viz. walking
I walk one day in a walking group in the mountains of the Pyrenees and the rest of the week I try to maintain walking on the boulevards – roughly between 70 and 100 km per week.
other sports have negative side effects, like running, most people are a bit weighty and ruin there knees,
cycling I call a lazy sport.
the other item I will deepen: the visit to dr. Bihl in Stuttgart: he invites about 4 to 5 patients – they all have to be there at noon, as soon as the last person arrives he orders a lab to make a nuclear based medicine which has a maximum life-time of 6 hours – whilst waiting for the arrival of the medicine he asks the patients to drink water with a reactionary substance what will make the 7meters long intestines go white on the computer screens and underneath more darker so to observe and notice more clearly the reaction in colour of the nuclear based medicine what will be inserted in a vein of an arm just before entering the MRI-scan – dr. Bihl has two assistants, also physicians,
they all look at what appears on the screen and the patients who are send there by local physicians who are dealing with critical patients and self searching ones like me.
Of course local physicians DO NOT like sending patients to this specialist because it can show them up in a negative light….
The PSA has a soft maximum of 4 and a hard maximum of 10
when that is reached something should be done.
The result I got was that I had a tiny inflammation in the lobes of the prostate, which goes away by itself.
The HIFU-system(I think it means High Intensity Frequency Unit) is to burn the bad molecules in the prostate and leave the good ones untouched and one is cured and enjoy sex again. The prostate with older men are mostly bigger and have to be shrunk by a chemical medicine(sometimes with side effects) or in the HIFU treatment it is peeled first (like a potatoe) to fit the machine.
Dick
I read the patient’s story (i.e.Ben Hunter) with great interest because I studied for abt. 20 years from age 50 to 70 a few nights a week in internet and learned a few things from specialists(few) who were honest…
my PSA slowly went upwards in a yo-yo style than 5.6 changing into 7.3 than 6.2 so when it goes up and down it is not prostate-cancer it is benign hyperplasia – my prostate is 5 times bigger than normal-normal is 30grams,mine is 160grams I am waiting for a MRI-scan(resonancia magnética).
What I have learned by meeting a technician who actually
had prostate cancer,where the specialist insisted on “biopsy” 6 takes which caused bleeding and they did not find any cancer, than 10 times “biopsy”(having heavy bleeding for a solid 2 weeks, almost causing a trauma) than a few had cancer results but this rich man phoned anywhere in the world for a secure-treatment of killing the cancer cells but not the good ones so that he could be cancer free and still uses his prostate. He found only one place in the world viz.
a prostate clinic in Heidelberg, Germany who uses the HIFU-system a bit different than other clinics and with better results.After a year his PSA went from 0 to 1.0 than he had to call- they advised him to go to Stuttgart dr. Bihl and have a MRI-scan -they saw cancer-cells roaming around the prostate – he than phoned LE(=Life Extension)in USA who are a group of young physicians who make their own supplements
after discussion amongst the group they advised him which
supplements to take – which strength – and when to take it and how many times a day.
with this knowledge, when my PSA climbed in a wave-pattern passed 10.0 the specialist wanted a “biopsy” which I refused. In jan.2018 it was 12 – in april it peaked at 17 –
than I started really to change my eating habits –
and in 3 weeks it went down to 11.3 also I noted that my CRP went down as well from 0.55 to 0.11,
because eating tomatoes and fish flushed down by pomegranate
(100%)juice eating more vegetables(broccoli) and fruit(mixing several red fruits)as well bananas plus walnuts&pistache.
A note: I use fish viz tuna fish in olive oil in glass pots
(not in cans)
Doctors should NEVER prescribe: taking “biopsy” from the prostate. WHY: they make a hole in that tiny organ –
if there is cancer it can escape – but what is more critical or dangerous is the fact that the needle can destroy the function of the valve in the middle of that tiny organ which will make the patient incontinent – several doctors advice
to take the whole organ away than it happened a lot that the “biopsy” of the removed prostate appeared to be benign and not cancerous. But than the damage is done and the patient can hardly drink anything anymore and has to try the wake up dormant muscles(only possible with very strong willed men but taking abt 3 to 6 months) around his urine tract in order to drink something.I am taking now when I go to sleep a tablet(SILODYX 8mg)in order to shrink my oversized prostate.
Extra note: I am 78years of age
I am the first born from 5, no.2 2 years younger never had anything checked by regular blood results and eating mostly
in the States(assigned work)reached 65 years of age and after 3 month they found prostate cancer and within 3 month he perished.
I take abt. 10 different supplements all anti-oxidant, rising immune levels also saw palmetto,Lycopene,vit.E,Selenium,Q10,B-complex,B12,Silicium
Eating: no more potatoes, no more fried, no meat, no cola or juices, no alcohol, no more eggs, no sausages, no milk products, only from plants, no butter, no mayonnaise, etc
So a great website, but missing a few items.
Dutchman, living in Spain, still learning+reading
the best article ever thanks my doctor discover a very high PSA but at 77 years old I am not worried my PSA the last 10 years has been having a yo-yo up and down but now reading that article will change my diet or already very good but without tomatoes will try that one.
thanks again
This study was approved by the CHS institutional review board. The study was exempt from the requirement for informed consent.
Discussion
We used a data set involving more than 2.4 million vaccinated persons from an integrated health care organization to evaluate the safety profile of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. The main potential adverse events identified included an excess risk of lymphadenopathy (78.4 events per 100,000 persons), herpes zoster infection (15.8 events), appendicitis (5.0 events), and myocarditis (2.7 events).
To place these risks in context, we also examined data on more than 240,000 infected persons to estimate the effects of a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection on the incidence of the same adverse events. SARS-CoV-2 infection was not estimated to have a meaningful effect on the incidence of lymphadenopathy, herpes zoster infection, or appendicitis, but it was estimated to result in a substantial excess risk of myocarditis (11.0 events per 100,000 persons). SARS-CoV-2 infection was also estimated to substantially increase the risk of several adverse events for which vaccination was not found to increase the risk, including an estimated excess risk of arrhythmia (166.1 events per 100,000 persons), acute kidney injury (125.4 events), pulmonary embolism (61.7 events), deep-vein thrombosis (43.0 events), myocardial infarction (25.1 events), pericarditis (10.9 events), and intracranial hemorrhage (7.6 events).
An association between Covid-19 vaccination and myocarditis has been previously reported. 20 Although no cases of myocarditis were reported in the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech), 2 mRNA-1273 (Moderna), 3 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) 4 phase 3 clinical trials, multiple cases of myocarditis after Covid-19 vaccination have recently been reported in the literature, 21-25 and both the Israeli Ministry of Health 26 and the CDC have investigated this association. 27 The risk appears to be highest among young men. 26,27 We found that the risk of myocarditis increased by a factor of three after vaccination, which translated to approximately 3 excess events per 100,000 persons; the 95% confidence interval indicated that values between 1 and 5 excess events per 100,000 persons were compatible with our data. Among the 21 persons with myocarditis in the vaccinated group, the median age was 25 years (interquartile range, 20 to 34), and 90.9% were male.
Another vaccine-related adverse event that has recently received attention in the medical literature is Bell’s palsy. In a recent article based on publicly available data from the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine trials, Ozonoff et al. 28 suggested a possible association between these vaccines and Bell’s palsy and estimated a rate ratio of approximately 7.0. This conclusion differed from the Food and Drug Administration briefing on these vaccines in December 2020; that briefing considered the incidence of Bell’s palsy to be similar to the background incidence. 5 A small number of cases of Bell’s palsy after Covid-19 vaccination have also been reported in the literature. 29,30 In the current study, the effect estimate was consistent with a potentially mild increase in the risk of Bell’s palsy after vaccination, with a risk ratio of 1.32 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.86). The absolute effect was small, with up to 8 excess events per 100,000 persons being highly compatible with our data according to the 95% confidence interval. Herpes zoster infection, the incidence of which we found to be increased after vaccination, is one of the potential causes of facial-nerve palsy. 31
Another particularly notable class of adverse events that has been reported in the context of Covid-19 vaccines is thromboembolic events. These adverse events, which primarily affect young women, have been linked with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 32 and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson–Janssen) Covid-19 vaccines, 33 both of which are adenoviral vector vaccines. However, we did not find an association between the BNT162b2 vaccine and various thromboembolic events in this study.
Some initially unexpected effects were seen in the results of the current study. The BNT162b2 vaccine appears to be protective against certain conditions such as anemia and intracranial hemorrhage. These same adverse events are also identified in this study as complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, so it appears likely that the protective effect of the vaccine is mediated through its protection against undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection, which may be undiagnosed either because of a lack of testing or because of false negative PCR results.
This study has several limitations. First, persons in the study were not randomly assigned according to exposures (vaccinations and SARS-CoV-2 infections); this may have introduced confounding at baseline and selection bias at censoring, especially since a single set of confounders was used for adjustment in the assessment of many disparate adverse events. Second, the matching process that was necessary to attain exchangeability between the study groups resulted in a study population with a different composition than the eligible population (e.g., median age, 38 years rather than 43 years). Because this different composition changes the population over which the causal effect is being estimated, different estimates might be found for adverse events for which the incidence may differ substantially between subgroups (e.g., myocarditis). Also, we excluded certain populations (such as health care workers and persons residing in long-term care facilities) that could be at particularly high risk for certain adverse events. Both of these issues should be taken into account when considering the generalizability of the findings.
Third, some diagnoses that were recorded in out-of-network hospitals, which were delayed in being reported to the insurer and were not entered by the person’s general practitioner from the hospital discharge notes into the outpatient medical record, could have been missed. Fourth, it is possible that persons are more likely to increase their levels of clinical awareness, concern, or both after vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection, and thus they may be more likely to report or seek medical care for their symptoms, resulting in a spuriously increased incidence of the various adverse events in the vaccinated or infected groups. Similarly, among persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the spike in the incidence of certain adverse events in the first day of follow-up could indicate the initial clinical manifestation of the infection, but it could also be related to active testing for SARS-CoV-2. Fifth, all the effect measures that we presented are based only on a new incidence of the specific adverse event under study; thus, less light was shed on the potential additional risk among persons with a medical history of each of these adverse events. However, this choice was necessary to distinguish between true new diagnoses of a given adverse event and recoding of past diagnoses and to ensure the accuracy of the adverse-event labels.
In this study, we sought to place the increased risk of adverse events caused by the BNT162b2 vaccine in context by contrasting this risk with that of the same adverse events after documented infection with SARS-CoV-2. We thought that this was necessary because vaccination and its potential risks do not occur in a void but rather in the context of an ongoing pandemic. Although the general risks of hospitalization, severe disease, and death from Covid-19 are widely recognized, secondary complications of infection are less well known. Therefore, in this analysis, we sought to estimate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the incidence of the same list of adverse events examined in the vaccination analysis. Because the cohorts that we used to study the vaccine and infection effects were different in composition, care should be taken when comparing the resulting risk estimates. In addition, knowledge of these risks alone is insufficient for a complete decision-theoretic analysis. When a person decides to become vaccinated, this choice results in a probability of 100% for the vaccination, whereas the alternative of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection is an event with uncertain probability that depends on the person, place, and time. Moreover, infection with SARS-CoV-2 has many other adverse effects beyond those considered here, including the risk of transmission to family members and others.
We estimated that the BNT162b2 vaccine resulted in an increased incidence of a few adverse events over a 42-day follow-up period. Although most of these events were mild, some of them, such as myocarditis, could be potentially serious. However, our results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection is itself a very strong risk factor for myocarditis, and it also substantially increases the risk of multiple other serious adverse events. These findings help to shed light on the short- and medium-term risks of the vaccine and place them in clinical context. Further studies will be needed to estimate the potential of long-term adverse events.